Friday, May 27, 2011

The Hangover Part II has a bad hangover,but it’s still worth the trip


Film: The Hangover Part II (A)
Starring: Bradley Cooper, Zach Galifianakis, Ed Helms, Ken Jeong, Paul Giamatti, Mason Lee, Jamie Chung, Justin Bartha
Director: Todd Phillips
Rating: **

The trio that had us laughing our guts out in 2009 is back, and this time they’re in East Asia. Stu (Helms) is getting married to the girl of his dreams Lauren (Chung) in Thailand. While Phil (Cooper) is pissed off about the long flight, Doug (Bartha) wants his brother-in-law Allen (Galifianakis), who is sulking and waiting for an invite to his best friend Stu's wedding, to be invited. The "wolf pack" takes off for Thailand but this time, they have Lauren's underage brother Teddy (Lee) in their pack, much to Allen’s chagrin. The fact that Teddy is a child prodigy and a surgeon-to-be only adds to his irritation.
Still not recovered from the trauma of Doug's Vegas bachelor party, Stu conveniently wraps up his bachelor party at an iHop. However, two nights before the wedding, the "wolf pack" decides to get beer and some marshmallows by a beach fire, Doug and Teddy in tow. And we assume the adventure begins as they wake up in a random hotel room in Bangkok. What follows is a skeleton of the The Hangover dressed up in brand new garb.
There’s a drug peddling monkey, a lost member that the trio must find, a wedding in the waiting, drama, action, car chase, a transvestite stripper, police blah blah blah. Unlike the first film, this one completely lacks a surprise element and in fact becomes a bit too predictable. What works for the film though are the performances and the comic timing that the cast shares. Ken Jeong is absolutely delightful and refreshing.
All in all, The Hangover Part II has bad ass hangover of The Hangover and makes a forced attempt at squeezing the last drop of laughter out of the zaniness that was the plot of the first film. The film gives you a few giggles and guffaws but no, you won't be giggling randomly thinking of the movie weeks later. Maybe you will think of Mr Chow and giggle but that's about it.
The Bottom Line
What happens in Bangkok isn’t as much fun as when it happened in Vegas, but it’s still worth the trip.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Kung Fu Panda 2 PANDAlicious.... It’s a sin to miss it .. Rating: 4/5

It’s the kind of yummy fun that all age groups will gobble up and burp with satisfaction. With the perfect blend of quirkiness, gags, action and emotional razzmatazz, it’s definitely the most lovable and enjoyable film of the summer. Director Jennifer Yuh sure knows how to keep Po’s fans engaged and pleased.
An interesting bunch of characters are introduced, a special little story is woven around Po’s mysterious past (you didn’t really think his father was a goose right?) and all the hit elements of the first addition are retained. Let’s just say “Kung Fu Panda 2” knows exactly how to rock all our animation loving boats.
This addition sees the emergence of a formidable new villain – Lord Shen, The Peacock, who plans to use a secret, unstoppable weapon to conquer China and destroy kung fu. It is up to Po and The Furious Five to journey across China to face this threat and vanquish it. But how can Po stop a weapon that can stop kung fu? To top it all, Lord Shen also has a Dark connection to Po’s tragic past. Po must now uncover the secrets of his mysterious origins; only then will he be able to unlock the strength needed to defeat the terrible Lord Shen.
The chemistry between the brilliant new villain – The Peacock (Gary Oldman) and Po is especially enjoyable. They share a sort of wit and repartee that adds a nice edge to their love-hate routine. Gary Oldman voices the scheming peacock with much pizzazz. We see Po’s character evolve as we see new depth added to the character of his father, Mr. Ping (the goose), as well as The Tigress (Jolie). But the other members of The Furious Five hardly go through any evolution as characters. The four remain one dimensional despite stars like Jackie Chan, Lucy Liu and Seth Rogen voicing them.
But apart from that, it’s near perfect, the effortless Kung Fu sequences, the breathtaking backgrounds and the stunning fireworks. But the cherry on the cake is definitely the exhilarating climax at sea.
Verdict: Like I said, it’s near perfect; it’s a sin to miss it.

Friday, May 20, 2011

National Film Awards

58th National Film Awards were announced on Thursday. Tamil and Malayalam films won major awards.
Aadukalam movie sweeped major chunk of awards.

1.    Best Feature film: 'Adaminte Makan Abu' (Malayalam)
 
2.    Best Wholesome Entertainer: 'Dabangg'
3.    Best Debut Film:  Baboo Band Baaja (Marathi)
4.    Best Children's Film:  Hejjegalu (Kannada)
5.    Best Director: Vetrimaran, 'Aadukalam' (Tamil)
6.    Best Screenplay: Vetrimaran, 'Aadukalam'
7.    Best Actor: Dhanush (Aadukalam - Tamil) and Salim Kumar (Adaminte Makan Abu - Malaylam)
8.    Best Actress: Mitalee Jagtaap (Baboo Band Baaja - Marathi)  and Saranya (Thenmerku Paruvakatru - Tamil)
9.    Best supporting Actor: J Thambi Ramaih (Mynaa - Tamil)
10.    Best Supporting Actress: Sukumari (Malayalam)
11.    Best Child Artist: Shantanu Ranglekar, Vivek, Harsh Myal
12.    Best Music: Vishal Bhardwaj (Ishqiya)
13.    Best Singer Female: Rekha Bhardwaj (Ishqiya)
14.    Best Singer Male: Suresh Wadekar
15.    Best Lyricist: Vairamuthu
16.    Best dialogues: Sanjay Pawar
17.    Best Make Up Artist: Vikram Gaikwad, Moner Maanush'
18.    Best special effects: Enthiran Robot.
19.    Best Choreographer: Dinesh (Aadukalam)
20.    Best Audiography: Kamod Karade (Ishqiya)
21.    Best Sci & Tech Film: 'Heart to Heart'
22.    Best Sports Film:  Boxing Ladies
23.    Special Jury Award:  Kabira Khada Baazar Mein'
24.    Best educational Film: 'Advaitham'  (Telugu)
25.    Best Art & Culture Film: 'Leaving Home'
26.    Best Debut Non-feature Film:  Tistulia
27.    Nargis Dutt Award: 'Moner Manush'
28.    Best Film On social Issues: 'Champions'
29.    Best Film on Environment: 'Beetari Jeeva'
30.    Best Production Design: Robot
31.    Special Jury Award: Mi Sindhutai Satka


Best films in regional category
 

32.    Best Hindi Film: Do Dooni Chaar
 
33.    Best Marathi Film: Mana Ayi Vacha
34.    Best Assamese Film: Jetuka Patar Dare
35.    Best Kannada Film: Putukarna Highway
36.    Best English Film: Memories in March

Monday, May 16, 2011

Ragini MMS is terrifyingly real


Films that are conventionally shot but claim to use real-life footages tend to have an eerie aura around them.
With Balaji's latest roll-out, Ragini MMS -- a sex-induced paranormal thriller -- the industry's unrelenting hunger to seek inspiration from the West continues. American indie film Paranormal Activity, which rose to shockingly unexpected heights and raked in multi-folded returns on a miniscule investment, is the fundamental motivation of the makers behind this clandestinely filmed horror caper. That, and a slice of The Blair Witch Project -- which is where the filmmaking technique originally, and quite successfully, penetrated mainstream cinema.
Uday (Raj Kumar Yadav) and Ragini (Kainaz Motivala) decide to set on a naughty weekend at a friend's farmhouse. On reaching there, the magic between the sheets isn't the same as anticipated, as creepy instances become a nasty nuisance.

Uday, much to his horror (and also to the diminution of his self-assuring macho demeanour), witnesses a paranormal presence. Through him, it says lines like, 'Me chudail nahi aahey', pulls his hair with such robust force, his skull bleeds, and in a highly volatile fashion, ruptures the prized bed.
Ragini is eye-poppingly intimidated and more so because she's snarled to the bed with a pair of handcuffs as part of a 'naughty' experiment earlier. Helpless, fearful, and sensing a sleazy MMS racket -- Raginis' attempts in freeing herself from an obnoxious white-lady, who's trying to prove her innocence of not being a 'chudail', and of not being guilty of her children's murder form the significant half of the film.
The film centres on the cliched haunted house. The makers don't bother to divulge any solid background as to the history of the house. Instead, with a Bigg Boss  like setup, they serve us with chunks of spooky instances the concealed cameras capture.
Much of the film isn't made to immediately jerk you off your seat. It heavily (also intentionally) relies in conjuring the anxiety of anticipation. So the girl, like you'd expect, wouldn't be screeching her lungs out for more than half of the film. Nor would be the guy treated to severe bangs and bashes by the bhoot.
Instead, the makers succeed in creating a fear-provoking atmosphere by fractionally giving cues of the abnormality of the bungalow. This works. Even when there is just casual banter, flowing beer and blooming romance, you constantly expect an abrupt catastrophe.
Uday isn't here just for his physical indulgence. A much larger sex-racket is at play. His quest of a breakthrough in the glam circle as an actor is the luring exchange.
Uday's character is sharply designed. He is clearly insensitive, and impulsively unconcerned. His apathetic nature is apparent from his routine conduct. He kicks his girl on the face to wake her up, abuses mercilessly when she leaks the details of their love-nest. His general banter is that of a city cheapster, the ones who juggle hot girlfriends.
The abuses are countless, but arising out of necessity. Uday's frustration is best conveyed by a cuss. And so is his freaky avatar post his discovery of the ghostly presence. Raj Kumar Yadav's Uday is terrifically convincing. He might be all stormy and street-smart but that's genuinely converted to sheer fright when the rival you are dealing with is out of the natural.
Ragini emits brilliance in equal measure. Her shrieks don't sound contrived. Her ruthless madness -- which comes out due to the frustration and scare of being knotted in an unnervingly crazy house with your boyfriend's bleeding corpse for company -- is conveyed plausibly by the inhibited body language, and dreadful, perplexed expressions.
If the film's first half is a sensibly written built-up, the latter half consequentially explodes with utter horror. It is again chronicled through a static-infused videotape, and the punches here hit hard, and shock more. The dialogues are so situational and conversational -- they add to the authenticity, along with infusing humour.
Pawan Kripalani's direction and screenplay (alongside Vaspar Dandiwala) is stylishly sleek, honest and free of manipulation. It cleverly leads us into believing the entire awfulness as a disturbing real-life occurrence.
And therein lies Ragini's rub. It doesn't really throw you off by the current happenings nor does it want you too. It's not conventional horror; it is the chance possibility of such paranoia that is psychologically disturbing.
The imperfections of the film lie in the overpowering background tone, which tries to over dramatize the horror. It reflects fluctuating buoyancy on part of the makers, as if the white-lady has a complex of not being able to solely evoke fear. Also, conspicuous is the need for a close-fitting editing.
That overlooked, Ekta Kapoor's  new film is terrifyingly real, and immensely watchable for the cold fright it inspires. She must be lauded for relying on fresh young actors, and believing in the risky attempt of largely untouched storytelling.

Rating: 4/5

Ash, Madhur Heroine First Look

Stanley Ka Dabba is a marvellous debut... Rating: 5/5



In many ways, Amole Gupte's  directorial debut plays out like a classic Western. A grumpy old Sheriff, a veritable bloodhound, starts sniffing around as the sun makes its way overhead and sweat starts rolling down his face. The harmonica -- and the uneven twang of a lonely banjo -- here signals his hunger, hunger he attempts to hide from a roomful of varmints by wiping drops of sweat and the beginnings of drool off with the same once-white kerchief. The outlaws -- runts who dutifully call all ladies "ma'am" -- watch him, fascinated and repelled in equal measure, as do we, in extreme close-up. This is tiffin-break as high noon.

Not that Stanley Ka Dabba, the fabulous treat Mr Gupte brings to our quality-hungry cinematic stomachs, is like a cowboy movie, of course. It is a delightfully simple story about a young boy, his friends and a schoolteacher who isn't his greatest fan, and yet, like the finest of children's tales, it has the power to be just as epic as the children want it to be. Amole, clearly a man who enjoys decapitating our existing cynicism and bringing us on par with his wonderful young protagonists, and for this -- and the resultant return to innocence -- we must be very grateful indeed.
Our young hero here is called Stanley, and played as he is by Partho, he's damn near irresistible. A highly imaginative lad with wide-eyed enthusiasm showing off inner gallons of can-do juice, Stanley's slightly broken English straightens itself (like his schoolboy-slouched spine) for the cutesy English teacher he has a crush on, and who rewards him with pats to the head and chocolate-bars to the pocket. He keeps the pats smugly enough but immediately shares the more tangible spoils with his mates, a group that reveres him and only occasionally wonders why he doesn't bring any food to school.
Not so for Babubhai Verma, who reveres not and wonders a lot. Hindi teachers have a tough life, appearing intimidating to their students by default, by dint of the scale of sheer listlessness their subject provokes. Little neckties are loosened; notebook margins are doodled on; poetry is yawned through; and grammar remains routinely un-grasped. Both students and teachers give up on feigning actual interest soon enough, the former putting up with classes barely bothering to stifle their yawns while the latter just turn grouchy and irritable. Verma, however, is strange even by Hindi teacher standards, not merely a mean-spirited slob but an odd blend of a gluttonous ogre and an inexplicable miser.
A character like this might certainly have seemed like an unreal villain caricature, but if only the film, like its camera, wasn't at eye-level with the children. And in their eyes, he's as bad as any mustachioed gangster could ever be. Stanley Ka Dabba is special not just because of how evocatively it captures a time we've each left behind, but because of the breathtaking confidence it has in its stellar young cast, letting them laugh the cynicism right out of us. It is their film and yet one we gladly take to and seek refuge in. There Is A Happy Land Where Only Children Play, Bowie once sang, and it is films like this that let us adults play make-believe, pretending that we're still allowed inside -- if only for a while.
Finding friendship in shared Maggi and mom-made parathas, the film itself is gloriously shot, raw and digital and made authentic by a complete usage of natural light. Cinematographer Amol Gole used a still SLR camera, Canon's lovely 7D, to make sure the kids (who were shot without missing school, only on Saturdays and during vacation-time) could be themselves, free and feckless and open to constant improvisation. The results are striking, a film that feels both stunningly real and yet beautifully textured, color-corrected immaculately enough to look markedly un-digital on the big screen.
The cast is perfect, without exception. Partho, Gupte's son, has the sort of screen-presence our A-listers would be jealous of, and is bright and plucky and ingenuous; think Dennis The Menace, only with Mr Wilson as a schoolteacher. His classmates are terrific too, and -- while I single out Aman Mehra (played by Numaan Sheikh), the wealthy but wonderful kid who, like a true Mafioso, only shows his authority when the chips are down -- the entire bunch should be proud. So Abhishek Reddy, Saisharan Shetty, Monty Sarkar , Leo Crasto, Ganesh Pujari and Walter D'Souza, get your parents to buy you ice-cream tonight, come what may. You've earned it, and how.
The grown-ups work just as well. Gupte himself, the villain of the piece, has a blast being bad and oscillates with alarming effectiveness between riotously funny and plain frightening. It is a tricky, tightrope-walk of a role, hard to find balance in and very nuanced -- Verma is, in many ways, exactly what Stanley could potentially turn out to be -- and Gupte works it most impressively indeed. Divya Jagdale's Science Teacher is so spot-on she makes you shudder, while Divya Dutta's  Rosy Miss is sure to bring back rose-tinted memories of saccharine-oversweet teachers you couldn't get enough of. In a smaller role as the glad-to-share purveyor of exotic sounding vegetarian food, Raj Zutshi does quite nicely, as does Shiv Subramaniam in a little math-teacher cameo, one clearly and vocally impressed by the best paneer he's eaten.
We were first introduced to Gupte as an actor in Vishal Bhardwaj's  smashing Kaminey, and there are a couple of nods to that film here as well: the kids break into a deliciously aggro version of Dhan-te-nan when the classroom is sans teacher, and at one point a janitor shrugs off the difference between IV C and IV F, saying "C and F are the same thing," essentially a line Bhardwaj's lisping leading man would have gladly agreed with. Make no mistake, Stanley is a highly clever product -- my favourite scenes may well be wordless, those of a teacher glaring at Verma as he unabashedly scavenges in the staff-room – and very-well sliced together by editor Deepa Bhatia. The pacing really works while the music mostly looks to food for lyrical inspiration. And Nikal Padi is the best thing Shankar Mahadevan's  done in years.
The best, purest film to come out of Hindi cinema in a while, this. Take a bow, Man With No Tiffin. Take a bow while we take off our hats.

Rating: 5/5

Seema Tapakai is a time-pass film


Allari Naresh always chooses scripts that entertain. The audience can happily shut themselves away from their real-life hassles and have a roller-coaster ride of emotions and laughter watching Allari's and his antics.
Incidentally his films have something to talk about: A theme/subject relevant to contemporary times, woven seamlessly to induce hilarity much to the audience's delight. Seema Tapakai, his latest release, too falls in the same category -- a story with a message and thoroughly entertains in the first half and adds a tinge of seriousness in the second half.
Director Nageswara Rao has ensured that Naresh's success streak more or less continues with Seema Tapakai and also introduces a new heroine Poorna (a known name in Tamil film industry) in Telugu.
GK (Sayaji Shinde ) is a crorepati who wants to amass more wealth. Though he lives well with his family, he is stingy when it comes to parting with money or doing charity. One of his sons Krishna (Naresh) falls in love with Satya  (Poorna). Satya is against crorepatis. She is forever mouthing anti-crorepati dialogues and espouses for their wealth to be distributed amongst the poor and the needy.
She teaches slum children and does whatever she can for the betterment of the poor. When Krishna is smitten by her he is forced to act like a poor guy and makes his family to pretend he wants to earn Satya's love.
Now, the crorepati family is made to act like paupers. They wear tattered clothes, sell Mirchi bhajias, bananas, flowers, iron clothes etc., all so that Krishna could earn Satya's affections. Since the family loves Krishna they do it for him at his behest.

Later it is revealed that Satya is the daughter of a factionist (Nagineedu) and her uncle Rao Ramesh saves her from being kidnapped. Krishna comes to know this story but hides it from his family. There is enough bloodshed, revenge etc as another factionist Venkatappa (Jayaprakash Reddy) too pitches in.
Will the lovers unite against all the opposition? Well, you got to check that out yourself.
But the first half is a nice laugh riot. It's enjoyable to watch Naresh's antics to woo Satya. At times one feels there's an overdose of the anti-crorepati mouthed by the leading lady. The director ensures that there are no dreary moments in the first half.
The second half does become a bit sentimental and melodramatic, though.
There are quite a few songs -- one of them reminiscent of yesteryear backdrop and costume. The dialogues induce laughs. Of course there's Brahmanandam to add more to it although his role is not properly etched and sounds repetitive. MS Narayana and LB Sriram add their share of comedy.
Naresh can sleepwalk through such roles. He is convincing in whatever he does generally. Here too he's believable as the poor guy despite being the son of a crorepati. Newcomer Poorna is okay. She displays her glamorous side in the songs too. She dances fairly well but it would do her good if she could improve her expressions.
Sayaji Shinde, Sudha, Ravi, MS Narayana, LB Sriram, Nagineedu and Rao Ramesh fit their roles to the tee.
In a nutshell, Seema Tapakai is a time-pass film -- full of Naresh's fare. More so in this heat, one can escape to the cool confines of the theatre and have fun watching it.
Rating: 3/5

Friday, May 6, 2011

Engeyum Kaadhal delivers little


There are several plusses to the romantically titled Engeyum Kaadhal (Love Everywhere), produced by AGS Entertainment and directed by Prabhu Deva .
The first of which, undoubtedly, is the scintillating location: Paris. Nirav Shah's camera-work is brilliant, capturing the colours in a way that thrills everyone.
Another advantage is Nalini Sriram's pretty costumes that show off the leads in a very favourable light.
Editor Anthony shows his skill, while Harris Jeyaraj's foot-tapping numbers, already chartbusters, have been picturized very well.
The minus: the story is practically non-existent.

This means that in the place of an engaging screenplay, you've got to fill approximately two-and-half hours with plenty of gimmicks. Like director Prabhu Deva himself making a guest appearance, singing Engeyum Kaadhal along the streets of Paris, with couples kissing each other every two seconds. You also have Prakash Raj  with no real role whatsoever except to give the director his call-sheet dates.
You have perky, bubbly, enthusiastic Kayalvizhi aka Kayal (Hansika Motwani ), resident of Paris, a music college student who plays the cello on the streets to help the infirm, speaks with a baby voice to her father, private detective Rajasekhar (Suman).
One fine day, she sees multi-billionaire Indian businessman Kamal (Jayam Ravi) on the streets, waltzing with gorgeous women and instantly falls for him. It's love at first sight.
Kamal has no time for love; he believes in working hard for 11 months at home (which we're shown in two seconds) and then spends a month in Paris with women of his choice.
Kayal, of course, is a diehard romantic, bent on getting Kamal to fall in love with her.
Director Prabhu Deva makes his mark with his usual humorous touches, and brings some comic relief. Raju Sundaram provides some laugh-out-loud moments too, but his track is almost completely disconnected from the story.
There are no villains, no twists and turns, not even brilliant dialogues. Such stories do work, but you need a lot more than just love for that. Here, you have nothing to distract yourself with but beautiful Paris (which is a character in itself), and Hansika's pretty dresses. She does look angelic at moments, courtesy the camera and exotic locales. Her voice, though (dubbed by Savitha), does her no favours.
Jayam Ravi is much more the boy-next-door rather than a Casanova, and his effort to appear a ladies-man looks strained at times. Still, he does try his best. In this case, it's not the fault of the leads, but the lack of a story, that works against them.
The climax is a joke.
Engeyum Kaadhal is one of those movies that promises a lot, but delivers little. Watch the film only if you're in the mood for arm-chair travel to Paris and foot-tapping music.
Rating 2.5/5

Luv Ka The End Review.. It is engaging, fun


Like it is with all films that revolve around a college campus, we should just surrender to a pool of cliches with this one too.
Rhea (Shraddha Kapoor) is your quintessential cutie, who's on the verge of turning 18, and has extravagant plans for the D-day. She's dating college hottie Luv (Taaha Shah). He's an archetype of a college heartthrob, equipped with an awkward accent and a couple of chamchas as he belongs to a Billionaire Boys Club.
Just before Rhea's D-day, she spots Luv -- who she's already dreamed of marrying -- canoodling with a college rival at a city hotspot. Instead of retiring in a cocoon, she makes it her business to have an adventurously memorable 18 by making life hellish for the Casanova.
Now the execution of the desperate quest is what forms the body and the core crux of the film. It essentially is a chick-flick and makes no pretence in being so (No man can enjoy a Jaguar being mercilessly crushed by a trio of lasses).

Where the film delights is in the even manner the characters are sketched. They are the archetypal collegians, no doubt. They seem to represent an institution too idealistic -- like the stud with enviable cars and girls to match, the professor who's a fantasy to many students, the horny fatso, the instantly likeable chubby classmate who's more than occasionally witty, the health conscious, model demeanour-ed sidekick. It is but assumed that the presence of these many of them in a youthful set-up is inevitable.
But they aren't necessarily annoying, on the contrary, although they are an exhausted bunch where are films are concerned, their eccentricity and feeble humour, are both a treat to witness.
Another point of glory for the film is the vibrancy which never dims even for once. Many of the ploys that the girls employ are absurd, and might seem impossibly ludicrous, but nevertheless they evoke a weird sense of humour that switches from being witty to unintelligent yet laughable at all times.
Ashish Patil's (he makes one appearance) story isn't peculiarly outstanding, and neither is Bumpy's (he makes one too) direction that is mind-blowingly riveting. It is simply the film's premise you thoroughly enjoy, without helping yourself in comprehending the 'how's'.  
It is perfectly alright in unapologetically having fun over frequent gags, performances that are unexpectedly above mediocre, and production designs that with grandeur create a make-believe world, more fantasy than anything, without coming across as being too fabricated, or superficially conjured.
A revenge film of a confounded girl who's yet to hit adulthood, and in the course is cheated disturbingly by a richie-rich, Luv ka the End, assumingly, might be endorsed by every girl, or women who's ever been misled by a womaniser.
It is moronically absurd to even give it a thought about the pragmatic implication of what Luv Ka The End suggests, but it surely might be a woman's fantasy to make his ex-playboy-boyfriend to itch down there when on another date, get his credit expired as he looks sheepishly when the cheque arrives, and what's more, let his best buddies doubt his sexual orientation.
Thus, the film succeeds in achieving a sophomore girls' bustling rage, transformed into physical, mental torture for the double-dealing man.
Shenaz Treasuryvala and Roye Seagal's screenplay is innovatively penned, and maintains a steady pace although a few elements, hastily added toward the end, are a tad comical and too sugary. But that is acceptable as the movie isn't attempting to be heavily loaded with life-altering messages.
The film's clear inspiration from the American teen-comedy, John Tucker Must Die, and slightly Mean Girls, isn't escapable, but bluntly visible.
The biggest downer is perhaps the performance by the lead star, Taaha Shah. He has the looks but when it comes to saying the lines, he can't help but look that he's rehearsed it innumerably, and unsuccessfully.
Moreover, being the elite, slapdash, it's trying hard when he says, 'babez, chill'. An annoying accent, even if it is authentic, he makes 'birthday' sound like 'birday.'
Shraddha Kapoor has a charming screen presence, and though she's not a proficient actor so far, she is above average as the conflicted girl with a stubborn motive. Also, the supporting cast especially Pushtie Shaktie as the plump supporter induces laughs.
Casting Archana Puran Singh , who is the over the top, trying hard to blend with the 'yo' people mother-cum-love-counsellor is a cheesy yet appropriate choice, pretty much like Jenny Mccarthy  in John Tucker.
Luv Ka The End, because of the cleverly written characters and their traits, manage to bear realism even in its highly unrealistic context. The dialogues, as well as emotions extracted and portrayed have an uncanny vulnerability to legitimacy which is remarkable.
Although it still remains a frivolous, musical-comedy -- influenced partly by real teen and partly assumed adolescent sense, which is magnified dramatically and cinematically liberalised.
It makes for an engaging, fun, and an enthusiastic outing. Easily forgettable, momentarily enjoyable, youthfully relevant, relishing such cinema once in a while is not a crime after all.
Rating: 3/5

Haunted Review..Want to scream? Watch Haunted.


Horror chills in 3D
Story: A young broker (Mahaakshay) has the arduous job of selling off a haunted house in the hills. But before he can do that, he chooses to exorcise the house of its shrieking ghosts. More interestingly, it means travelling back in time to re-align an unsavoury incident that occurred 80 years ago. Can the broker seal his deal?
Movie Review: Vikram Bhatt's fascination for horror continues, even as the Indian film industry -- and the desi viewer -- desperately awaits the first authentic bone-chiller from Bollywood.
Is Haunted the answer to the chill hunters' prayers?
Not completely. And that's because the story is dog-eared and done-to-death. Almost every horror film has the wailing ghost of a nubile young maiden who sends outs desperate SOSs to anyone who dares to enter her domain. And don't we know why she's wailing! Still, we won't reveal the secret, which in any case, is hardly a secret....
But if the film works -- and it works quite well -- is only because of the special effects of the film. Experiencing the horror in 3D is indeed a novel experience for the viewer, specially since it is smartly done. Each time the ghosts lunge out at you, stick out their tongue or flail their limbs, you jump back in your seat. And yes, there are a lot of ghosts, performing a lot of ghastly acrobatics. There's even a snake sticking out its venom at you and a hurtling brick, almost missing your nose....Great fun.
Other than that, there is the scenic beauty (Pravin Bhatt's cinematography), a hummable music score (Chirantan Bhatt) and the eye for detail (the film moves back and forth in time) which keeps the hours ticking. Performance-wise, the director has opted for a bunch of new actors to pitch in as the lead pair. Sadly, there's nothing extraordinary about them and they hardly leave an impact. It's the veterans, like Achint Kaur and Arif Zakaria who end up giving you the goosebumps. And they do it in adequate measure.
Want to scream? Watch Haunted.

100% Love Review Rating: 3.5/5


100% Love Review
Banner: Geeta Arts
Cast: Tamanna, Naga Chaitanya, Tara Alisha
Music: Devi Sri Prasad
Presented by: Allu Arjun
Producer: Bunny Vasu
Direction: Sukumar

Director Sukumar has proved that he is not the run of the mill director and always tries to be different from the other directors. He has cult fans and even his flop films have stunning and intelligent scenes that prove his mettle. However, except his debut film Arya, Sukumar didn’t taste commercial success with his other films. But the audience who has high regard for Sukumar as a director never lost their faith in him. His latest film 100% Love is released today and check out the review to know whether he succeeded in delivering a hit or not. 
Story:
Balu Mahendra (Naga Chaitanya) is a number one student in his college. Mahalakshmi (Tamanna), his cousin comes to Balu’s house to continue her studies. She is in awe of her Mr. Perfect ‘Bava’ and takes his help to achieve big in studies. Surprisingly, she surpasses him and becomes the first ranker. Balu gets deeply hurt by this and he resorts to cunning ways to deviate Maha Lakshmi. But to his surprise Ajith (Anand) stands first this time. Meanwhile Maha Lakshmi father brings her a match but she doesn’t want to marry him. Balu helps her in getting the match canceled and Mahalakshmi starts deviating Ajith from studies for the sake of Balu. When the couple is heading to fall in love, Maha Lakshmi unknowingly hurts the ego of Balu and they get separated. How they unite forms rest of the story.
Analysis:
100% Love starts with a bang right from the title credits. Sukumar’s creativity is visible in the title designing. This is easily one of the best title credits we have ever seen. Even if you go with zero percent expectations to the movie, the title credits itself will raise your expectations over 80 percent. Sukumar did his best to live up to the expectations in every scene.
Most of the scenes and situations are refreshing. Characterizations are pretty unique too. None of our directors touched this complex angle in the lead man before. Sukumar did a brilliant job with the screenplay but it loses pace as it reaches the interval point. The intermission scene looked out of place but it is vital for the story to take a different path from then on.
Second half is mainly focused on the family values and the virtues of relations. Although the lead man irks you at times with his stupid ideology he makes it up in the scene where he reveals his love to the heroine. In the process of avoiding a predictable climax, Sukumar once again took the eccentric path and the characters starts talking illogically. But by then the film already proves your ticket worth and anything excess is just a bonus.
Performances:
Naga Chaitanya improved from his previous outings but he still needs to improve. His expressions in comedic scenes are not up to the mark. He failed to get the body language right in the drunken scenes. He is sophisticated and gives a feeling that he suits better to certain type of characters.
Tamanna is a good actress and she has proved her mettle yet again. Anand and Tara Alisha are just okay. Naresh is decent and Dharmavarapu’s comedy worked in parts. Most of the star cast consists of new actors and they did well. KR Vijaya and Vijaya Kumar are standard.
Tehnicalities:
Most of the songs were situational and Devi Sri Prasad did a fine job. Dooram Dooram and Infatuation songs stand out. Diyyalo Diyyala lacked punch on the screen. Background score is pretty good. Dialogues are decent without any drama or purposeful rhyming lines. Editing is up to the mark. Cinematography is an asset to the movie. Special care is taken in the detailing and Art department did a wonderful job. Production values are neat. Although the movie is made with a medium budget the producer never compromised on the quality of films.
          
Plus Points:
- Youthful elements
- Entertaining first half
- Novel approach
Minus points:
- Second half slows down a bit
- Climax is somewhat confusing
Final Word: 100% Love satisfies the targeted audience. Youngsters will fall in love with the film. It will do well in A centers and given its budget it should work on the commercial front too. People who love to watch different movies can give it a try. We have to wait and see if this film has something in it to pull the masses. That seems highly unlikely.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

See what LOKPAL BILL can do for INDIA

Lokpal Bill can curb the politicians:-
          
Existing System
System Proposed by civil society
No politician or senior officer ever goes to jail despite huge evidence because Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) and CBI directly come under the government. Before starting investigation or initiating prosecution in any case, they have to take permission from the same bosses, against whom the case has to be investigated.
Lokpal at centre and Lokayukta at state level will be independent bodies. ACB and CBI will be merged into these bodies. They will have power to initiate investigations and prosecution against any officer or politician without needing anyone’s permission. Investigation should be completed within 1 year and trial to get over in next 1 year. Within two years, the corrupt should go to jail.
No corrupt officer is dismissed from the job because Central Vigilance Commission, which is supposed to dismiss corrupt officers, is only an advisory body. Whenever it advises government to dismiss any senior corrupt officer, its advice is never implemented.
Lokpal and Lokayukta will have complete powers to order dismissal of a corrupt officer. CVC and all departmental vigilance will be merged into Lokpal and state vigilance will be merged into Lokayukta.
No action is taken against corrupt judges because permission is required from the Chief Justice of India to even register an FIR against corrupt judges.
Lokpal & Lokayukta shall have powers to investigate and prosecute any judge without needing anyone’s permission.
Nowhere to go - People expose corruption but no action is taken on their complaints.
Lokpal & Lokayukta will have to enquire into and hear every complaint.
There is so much corruption within CBI and vigilance departments. Their functioning is so secret that it encourages corruption within these agencies. 
All investigations in Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be transparent. After completion of investigation, all case records shall be open to public.  Complaint against any staff of Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be enquired and punishment announced within two months.
Weak and corrupt people are appointed as heads of anti-corruption agencies.
Politicians will have absolutely no say in selections of Chairperson and members of Lokpal & Lokayukta. Selections will take place through a transparent and public participatory process.
Citizens face harassment in government offices. Sometimes they are forced to pay bribes. One can only complaint to senior officers. No action is taken on complaints because senior officers also get their cut.
Lokpal & Lokayukta will get public grievances resolved in time bound manner, impose a penalty of Rs 250 per day of delay to be deducted from the salary of guilty officer and award that amount as compensation to the aggrieved citizen.
Nothing in law to recover ill gotten wealth. A corrupt person can come out of jail and enjoy that money.
Loss caused to the government due to corruption will be recovered from all accused.
Small punishment for corruption- Punishment for corruption is minimum 6 months and maximum 7 years.
Enhanced punishment - The punishment would be minimum 5 years and maximum of life imprisonment.


Please spread these words ; our Nation needs us..

Monday, May 2, 2011

Vaanam Review... Miss it at your own risk!


Vaanam review
Banner: Cloud Nine Movies
Studio: VTV Productions, Magic Box Pictures
Production: Dayanidhi Azhagiri, Ganesh
Direction: Krish
Star-casts: Silambarasan a.k.a Simbu(STR), Bharath, Anushka Shetty, Prakash Raj, Sonia Agarwal, Santhanam, Ganesh, Jayaprakash, Saranya Ponvannan, Vega, Jasmine Bhasin and others
Music: Yuvan Shankar Raja
Cinematographer: Nirav Shah
Editing: Anthony
Written: S. Gnanagiri

Vaanam looks all set to become one of the most-talked-about films in 2011. And we have three reasons to it. It is an early bird in the unexplored multistarrer genre, the narration is totally new to Tamil cinema and finally, the message it delivers is strong.
Credits go to director Krish, who has repeated the Tollywood magic in Kollywood too. Equally laudable are the producers, actors including STR, Bharath, Anushka and music composer Yuvan Shankar Raja.

For, all the above have joined hands to make a meaningful cinema, which at the same time is commercially viable too. Vaanam has in store comedy, romance, sentiments, suspense, and of course, a very good message.
Cable Raja (Simbu) is a cool cable TV operator who is ready to tell any number of lies to woo his ladylove (Jasmin Bhasin). Bharath Chakravarthy (Bharath) is hell bent on proving his mettle as a rock star. And we have a ravishing sex worker Saroja (Anushka), who vies to escape from the clutches of a prostitution house and earn more independently.

Meanwhile, there is a Muslim couple (Prakash Raj & Sonia Agarwal) who are victims of violence. Call it destiny or celluloid drama, these five come under one umbrella. What’s next, it forms the crux of the journey of fate, each one being the steering force of his destiny.
STR is back after Vinnaithandi Varuvaya and he looks like a typical cable guy who we see roaming in our neighbourhood. Bharath is suave while Anushka’s looks add immense glamour to the movie. Vega, Prakashraj and Sonia Agarwal prove their acting mettle well.
Yuvan Shankar Raja’s music is one of the important highlights of the film, with Evandi Unnai Pethan... already becoming an anthem. Other technical departments are okay. The strong point and weakness of Vaanam is its narration, which at times is confusing. But for this, Vaanam marks the beginning of a welcome trend. Kudos to Krish & Co.
What Works: Screenplay, Yuvan Shankar Raja, Nirav Shah, Perfect casting of actors, Performances
What doesn’t work: Lengthy first half, an unwanted song from Telugu version.
Verdict: Miss it at your own risk!

Fast Five Movie Review ....Really worth watching!!!!


Fast Five Review
Cast: Paul Walker, Vin Diesel, Dwayne Johnson, Jordana Brewster, Tyrese Gibson, Chris “Ludacris” Bridges, Sung Kang, Gal Gadot, Matt Schulze, Tego Calderon, Don Omar, Elsa Pataky, Joaquim de Almeida
Director: Justin Lin
Summer movie season usually starts the first week of May, but this year Fast Five is kicking things off a week early. Returning vets of the series Paul Walker, Vin Diesel, Jordana Brewster and Tyrese Gibson are joined by newcomer Dwayne Johnson for a car chase and heist movie that manages to be the fifth film in a franchise that somehow revitalized itself after a super-successful fourth entry. How good is the fifth film? Have a look…
The Story
After breaking Dominic Toretto (Diesel) out of jail, ex-FBI agent Brian O’Connor (Walker) and his girlfriend Mia (Brewster) are on the lam, only to hide out in Rio where Dom’s brother Vince (Schulze) lives with his wife. Brian, Mia and Dominic take a job stealing a couple cars (off a moving train), which goes bad and gets the ire of Rio’s crime kingpin Reyes (de Almeida). The car they stole holds info on his holdings, so the three assemble a team of thieves and car people to steal a hundred million dollars from Reyes. But because of the car heist gone bad they’re being tracked by Hobbs (Johnson), a no-nonsense FBI agent who is not to be triffled with.
The Good
This movie knows what it is: Though this franchise is baffling (how it survived it’s first two sequels is impressive), it feels like all the previous films have been a rough draft to finally get to this movie. It takes cast members from the earlier sequels (some killed off in previous entries) and brings them together for an “assemble the team” movie that delivers laughs and thrills better than any of the Ocean’s Eleven movies, or the Italian Job remake.
Practical Effects: When these cars are moving and crashing – though there’s definitely digital work to be found – for the most part you get the sense that you’re watching cars on streets interacting with each other. With car stunts movies that’s something that can’t be faked.
The Cast: The assemblage of all these cast members gives the film a number of different voices that it doesn’t have to establish. Since backstory is the death of these movies, that everyone involved shows up and delivers a moment or a line or two that kills, you’re constantly entertained by the ensemble. And it doesn’t hurt that the cast is filled with attractive people. Though the leads are a couple years on, men like Tyrese Gibson and Sung Kang have a sexy cool about them, while Gal Gadot and Elsa Pataky give the film some compentent acting and eye candy. That said, if someone walks away with this movie it’s…
Dwayne Johnson: As a film star, there’s been few roles that have given him as much fun things to do as this movie. He gets to bark orders, and do a riff on Tommy Lee Jones’s character in The Fugitive (which was a riff on Les Misérables‘ Javert), when the third act kicks in he gets to deliver some of the film’s best moments both as a character, and as a person who puts foot to ass.
The Mixed
Takes a while to get going: Though the opening is absurd in the right way, the film has a couple of opening it has to get through, from getting Dominic out of prison, establishing Rio, getting the gang in trouble with Reyes, establishing Johnson’s character and then assembling a team. But this also works for the film, as it builds to a great third act where the film is firing on all cylinders. It just takes a little for the film to settle in.
The Bad
Nothing, if you accept that this is a summer film: Look, there’s nothing all the deep going on in this film, there’s no subtext (not even the barely concealed homoeroticism of the second film), and everything is cartoonish and stupid. That said, it’s the right kind of cartoonish and stupid. It delivers, it delivers in a way that most big event films don’t. This is a full combo meal of junk food that manages to satisfy all cravings for what a good trashy film should be.
Overall
If someone told me that it would take five movies to make a great Fast and Furious film I would never believe them, but having seen Fast Five on Monday, I’m contemplating going back again this weekend. For whatever reason – however all the pieces came together – Justin Lin has managed to craft one of the most rousing, audience-pleasing, completely satisfying Summer films in a long, long time.
Really worth watching!!!!

Williams Middleton Royal Wedding In Pics 4 U















Rajinikanth's Rana Exclusive First Look